Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
J Appl Lab Med ; 7(6): 1430-1437, 2022 Oct 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1922285

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Boston Medical Center (BMC) is a safety net hospital in Boston, and from the initial wave of COVID-19 there has been an overwhelming concern about the exposure of healthcare workers (HCWs) to SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We conceived a study to follow a cohort of BMC HCWs, beginning in July 2020 and continuing for 15 months, collecting survey data and serum samples at approximately 3-month intervals. Serum samples were analyzed using the Abbott Architect i2000 for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (anti-spike1-Receptor Binding Domain IgG and anti-nucleoprotein IgG). Positive anti-n IgG results were used, in addition to reverse transcription-PCR results, for identifying cases of infection. History of COVID-19 and vaccination status were confirmed, where possible, using electronic medical records. Participants were grouped according to vaccination and infection status in September 2021 for analysis of anti-s IgG trends. RESULTS: A majority of HCWs remain well above the positivity threshold for anti-spike IgG antibodies for up to 11 months post-vaccination and 15 months post-infection, regardless of combinations and permutations of vaccination and infection. Those with COVID-19 infection before vaccination had significantly higher median serum antibody concentrations in comparison to HCWs with no prior infection at each follow-up time point. CONCLUSIONS: These findings further support what is known regarding the decline in serum antibody concentrations following natural infection and vaccination, adding knowledge of serum antibody levels for up to 15 months post- infection and 11 months post-vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Follow-Up Studies , Antibodies, Viral , Health Personnel , Immunoglobulin G
2.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(12): 1727-1732, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1497806

ABSTRACT

Biorepositories provide a critical resource for gaining knowledge of emerging infectious diseases and offer a mechanism to rapidly respond to outbreaks; the emergence of the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, has proved their importance. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the absence of centralized, national biorepository efforts meant that the onus fell on individual institutions to establish sample repositories. As a safety-net hospital, Boston Medical Center (BMC) recognized the importance of creating a COVID-19 biorepository to both support critical science at BMC and ensure representation in research for its urban patient population, most of whom are from underserved communities. This article offers a realistic overview of the authors' experience in establishing this biorepository at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic during the height of the first surge of cases in Boston, Massachusetts, with the hope that the challenges and solutions described are useful to other institutions. Going forward, funders, policymakers, and infectious disease and public health communities must support biorepository implementation as an essential element of future pandemic preparedness.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , COVID-19/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Pandemics , Specimen Handling , Boston , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Safety-net Providers , Urban Population
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL